Running is a waste of time.

Running is one of the most popular forms of exercise, often seen as the gateway to fitness. With no equipment required, many people assume it’s an easy and effective way to achieve their fitness goals. Programs like Couch to 5K and personal challenges to complete a marathon or half-marathon reinforce the idea that running is a universal solution for health and fitness.

But is running truly the best option for most people? Despite its accessibility, running may not be the smartest choice for achieving common fitness goals like weight loss, strength building, or improving athleticism. Instead, it often leads to high injury rates, limited results, and unnecessary frustration. This blog explores why running is overrated, offers insights into its shortcomings, and provides smarter alternatives—including Olympic weightlifting—for achieving specific fitness goals.

Why Running Might Be Overrated

1. High Risk of Injury
Running is notorious for its injury rate, particularly among recreational runners. Studies show that injury rates for running are as high as 20-79%, with knee, foot, and lower leg issues being the most common (van Gent et al., 2007). Comparatively:

Cycling has an injury risk of 5-15%, and these are often trauma-related rather than overuse (Clarsen et al., 2014).

Swimming carries one of the lowest injury risks, with rates of only 2-5% due to its low-impact nature (Barker et al., 2014).

Weightlifting, including Olympic lifts, has an injury risk of 2-4 injuries per 1,000 hours of training, largely due to improper technique rather than the activity itself (Keogh & Winwood, 2017).

For beginners or individuals prone to joint problems, running is one of the most injury-prone exercises and should be approached cautiously.

2. Running Doesn’t Guarantee Weight Loss
A common reason people start running is to shed pounds. While running burns calories, it may not be the most effective method for weight loss for two main reasons:

Calorie Overestimation: Many overestimate how much running burns and compensate by eating more, negating the calorie deficit.

Muscle Preservation: Running doesn’t significantly build or preserve muscle, leading to a reduction in metabolism over time. Strength-based activities like Olympic weightlifting help retain muscle mass, essential for sustained fat loss (Schoenfeld et al., 2011).

For lasting weight loss, combining strength training and a well-rounded diet is far superior to relying on running alone.

3. Limited Muscle Engagement
Running is a repetitive lower-body activity, focusing on the quads, calves, and hamstrings while neglecting upper-body strength, core stability, and flexibility. Olympic weightlifting and swimming engage multiple muscle groups, creating a more functional and balanced physique (McCall et al., 2010).

4. Repetitive Strain
The repetitive nature of running amplifies biomechanical weaknesses, making overuse injuries almost inevitable without proper training and recovery strategies. Diversifying exercises minimizes this risk and develops a more robust body.

Why Olympic Weightlifting Deserves a Spot

Olympic weightlifting—including the snatch and clean & jerk—requires explosive power, precision, and coordination. These movements offer a host of benefits for various fitness goals:

Full-Body Engagement: Every lift targets multiple muscle groups simultaneously.
Power and Explosiveness: Builds athletic traits that running can’t deliver.
Metabolic Boost: The intensity of Olympic lifting keeps your metabolism elevated long after the session ends.
Joint Stability: Properly executed lifts strengthen the tendons and ligaments around the joints, reducing injury risk.

Alternatives to Running

1. Swimming
Swimming provides a low-impact, full-body workout that strengthens the cardiovascular system and tones muscles. It’s an excellent choice for those with joint issues or recovering from injuries (Barker et al., 2014).

2. Strength Training
From free weights to machines, strength training is the foundation for building muscle, improving metabolism, and increasing bone density (Westcott, 2012).

3. Olympic Weightlifting
These dynamic, explosive movements enhance power, strength, and coordination, making them ideal for athletic performance and functional fitness. They also burn significant calories due to their intensity and complexity.

4. High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT)
HIIT offers short bursts of intense effort interspersed with recovery, maximizing calorie burn and aerobic fitness in a fraction of the time required for running (Gibala et al., 2006).

5. Cycling
A joint-friendly cardiovascular workout that can be scaled for intensity and endurance.

The Case for Running

Despite its drawbacks, running remains an accessible and convenient way to stay active. It’s particularly effective for improving cardiovascular endurance and mental toughness, and many runners report mood improvements thanks to the release of endorphins (Reynolds et al., 2016). However, for most goals, running is best used as a supplementary activity rather than a primary form of exercise.

Conclusion

Running may be popular, but it’s far from the most effective or versatile form of exercise. If your fitness goals include weight loss, strength building, or improved athleticism, activities like Olympic weightlifting, swimming, and strength training offer far superior benefits. By tailoring your exercise routine to your specific goals, you can maximize results while minimizing the risks associated with high-impact, repetitive activities like running. Before committing to your next jog, consider whether smarter, more targeted exercises might better serve your aspirations.

Need help?

If you  would like some help, visit our contact page, we are based in the coventry area for in-person sessions or able to provide online coaching and guidance.

[CLICK HERE]

References

Barker, A. L., Talevski, J., Bohensky, M. A., Brand, C. A., & Hunter, P. (2014). Exercise programs for people with arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 66(12), 1721-1731.

Clarsen, B., Myklebust, G., & Bahr, R. (2014). Development and validation of a new method for the registration of overuse injuries in sports injury epidemiology: The Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center (OSTRC) Overuse Injury Questionnaire. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(8), 495-502.

Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., van Essen, M., Wilkin, G. P., Burgomaster, K. A., Safdar, A., Raha, S., & Tarnopolsky, M. A. (2006). Short-term sprint interval versus traditional endurance training: similar initial adaptations in human skeletal muscle and exercise performance. Journal of Physiology, 575(3), 901-911.

Keogh, J. W., & Winwood, P. W. (2017). The epidemiology of injuries across the weight-training sports. Sports Medicine, 47(3), 479-501.

McCall, G. E., Byrnes, W. C., Dickinson, A., Pattany, P. M., & Fleck, S. J. (2010). Muscle fiber hypertrophy, hyperplasia, and capillary density in college men after resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 81(5), 2004-2012.

Reynolds, G., Lin, X., & Wright, H. (2016). The effect of exercise on mood and mental health. Journal of Affective Disorders, 200, 51-56.

Schoenfeld, B. J., Aragon, A. A., & Krieger, J. W. (2011). The effect of meal frequency on body composition during weight loss: A systematic review. Nutrition Reviews, 73(2), 69-82.

van Gent, R. N., Siem, D., van Middelkoop, M., van Os, T. A., Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M., & Koes, B. W. (2007). Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long-distance runners: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 41(8), 469-480.

Westcott, W. L. (2012). Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 11(4), 209-216.